Upgrades
When was the last time you used a travel agent? I asked that question in my book “Decoding Air Travel.” Last month, President Obama asked it, too, and the American Society of Travel Agents speedily protested. So let’s examine the modern — or perhaps not modern enough — travel-agency system and the value it brings.
Many young people don’t even remember the time when using a travel agent was the only practical way to book a trip. While many consumers today book their own travel, using travel agencies is still quite prevalent in the corporate world.
However, many business travelers I know are unhappy with their company’s travel agency. It’s clear the current system isn’t working well anymore for a variety of reasons. Without taking sides, let’s look at those reasons from the perspective of travel agencies and their customers.
If you are a traveler — for work or pleasure — you probably have at least one of the following problems with travel agents:
• They don’t always offer you the lowest fares or best itineraries;
• They only book tickets and leave the rest to you;
• They know little, if anything, about frequent-flier programs, elite status, miles and upgrades;
• They are not familiar with on-board products and don’t know which airlines have flat beds in Business Class;
• They don’t travel frequently, if at all, but sit in an office and rely on computers to tell them what to do;
• They are inflexible when schedule changes affect your tickets;
• They don’t take care of all your travel needs.
As the air travel system has become more complex and customer-unfriendly in recent years, the needs of the modern traveler have grown and diversified enormously. The traditional travel agency model has so far survived the Internet threat, but its relevance has diminished significantly, because it hasn’t caught up with the changes in travelers’ needs and demands.
Booking a ticket is no longer even close to enough. You have to be able to compare fares and products of different airlines and alliances, and to offer your customers the options that provide the best combination of price, comfort, convenience, maximizing frequent-flier miles, progress toward elite status, best upgrade opportunities and the most effective use of elite benefits.
For this to happen, you need a wealth of knowledge, which most travel agents don’t have. For example, you need to know what booking classes are eligible for upgrades and which don’t earn miles. It’s certainly unreasonable to expect one person to be familiar with each airline’s requirements, but there are ways to deal with that — an agency can have employees or teams specializing in the different alliances or groups of carriers.
Probably the two most important and consequential weaknesses of the agency model are its use of limited data and booking sources — often just one Global Distribution System (GDS) — and its almost exclusive reliance on automated systems to do all the work.
If you’ve read my book, you already know more than the average travel agent — and you realize why those two weaknesses result in millions of customers paying much more than they could be. Automation is no doubt vital for the travel-booking process, but given the intricacies of airfares and the tricks airlines have adopted to “maximize revenues,” sometimes we need to rely more on our brains than on machines.
One other thing to keep in mind when dealing with a travel agency is whether it has contracts with specific airlines. Airline commissions were discontinued years ago, but large agencies still have contracts. How does that affect you? The purpose of those contracts, of course, is to encourage agencies to send more business to the respective carrier. If your agency receives its biggest commission from American Airlines, it might book you on American even if Delta has a lower fare.
Now let’s look at the above-described picture from a travel agency’s perspective. Most agencies don’t have the pull of American Express and Carlson Wagonlit, and they don’t receive airline commissions. They do get GDS kickbacks, as well as transaction fees for provided services directly from clients — about $35 on average, though some charge as much as $90.
For what you pay them, they have decided that it’s not worth more than several minutes of an agent’s time to work on booking you a ticket. Then how do you expect them to do more than letting the computer do all the work? Would you pay them more to take care of your upgrade and other needs? I suppose it depends on whether you trust that agent to do a good job. There is no point in paying for something that you later have to fix yourself.
So what’s the solution? Should everyone stop using travel agencies? Of course not — they do have a place in the travel industry. Many companies simply can’t handle their travel volume without outside professional help. At the same time, the gap between agency services and travelers’ needs keeps widening.
One solution could be for agencies to have teams dedicated to high-end, high-demand executives, who are willing to pay more for additional services. Some large agencies already have such teams, but their tasks usually don’t include creative ways to save on airfare or any of the frequent-flier services described above.
There is another solution, which was suggested to me by — ironically — travel agency owners last year. They shared my observation about the gap between what they do and what their clients want, and urged me to bridge it. How? First, by educating their clients in seminars and private training how to do for themselves what the agencies don’t offer. Clients who don’t have the time or patience to learn can ask me to provide those additional services to them.
So to bridge that gap, I started my company, Kralev International LLC. As one of my clients says, we can do your homework if you don’t have time to do it yourself.
Related stories:
My book ‘Decoding Air Travel’ is out
Corporate travel’s lack of innovation
Kralev International launches website
Continue reading about Is the travel-agency model sustainable?
Flying Blue, the frequent-flier program of Air France/KLM, has banned customer service agents from revealing the codes the airlines use when booking awards or upgrades. If you ask them, they will tell you it’s none of your business. Is this misplaced paranoia or do carriers have the right to keep that information secret?
For smart and sophisticated travelers, the importance of having access to raw airline data cannot be overstated. Benefiting from that access has changed my travel life — it has ensured that I always pay the lowest possible fares and fly in comfort and luxury at the same time. Booking codes, of course, use letters of the alphabet.
Earlier this month, I needed to verify the codes Air France and KLM use for awards and upgrades for my upcoming book, because Flying Blue is making some changes beginning June 1. So I called the Flying Blue North American call center outside Toronto. An agent called Henry Esteban refused to share the information, saying he and his colleagues had specifically been forbidden by management to do so.
I’d never heard such a response to the same question I’d asked so many times before at other airlines, so I requested to speak with a supervisor. Esteban resisted repeatedly, which also surprised me given my Platinum elite status, but eventually he put me through.
The supervisor, Roberto Quote, was just as vehement in his refusal to discuss booking codes. He insisted that was private company information and customers had no right to know it. If you wonder why I didn’t turn to Air France reservations agents, that was actually my first call — but they said they knew nothing about awards and upgrades and referred me to Flying Blue.
In 2009, I wrote about the challenges to airlines presented by the transparency of their data on the Internet. I also wrote specifically about the public availability of award data, which some carriers wanted to control. However, simply identifying the codes used for awards and upgrades has never been an issue — until now.
Although no carrier is legally required to disclose those codes publicly, I have a hard time understanding Flying Blue’s thinking. Does its management really believe that kind of information can be kept secret in 2011, with all the blogs out there and websites like FlyerTalk.com and Milepoint.com?
It may be time for the program to focus on more meaningful and useful subjects in the training of its customer service agents.
Continue reading about Should airline booking codes be secret?
As United and Continental prepare to become one airline, they are making changes that, though necessary, are affecting negatively their customers. One consequence is that upgrades on international flights will be harder to get in the short run, and more expensive in the long run.
The carriers announced last month that they would begin “cross-fleeting” — swapping routes in each other’s network — and some of those changes have already been loaded in their schedules. Both United and Continental will be serving certain routes in the next several months, but each of them is taking over other routes entirely.
For example, all Anchorage flying goes to Continental, as do the Washington-Paris and Washington-Amsterdam routes, now operated by United. The current Continental flights from Newark to Zurich and Brussels, as well as its Houston-Lima flights, will be flown by United.
That practice is not unusual in airline pre-merger situations. While the United-Continental merger was legally completed late last year, they will be operating as separate airlines until they secure a single certificate from the Federal Aviation Administration, which is expected to happen by early next year.
However, United and Continental are implementing the route changes before resolving some technical issues that will harm their customers.
If you are a United 1K flier and have system-wide upgrade certificates, you can’t use them on the previously United flights now operated by Continental — and the other way around. The same applies to your confirmed regional upgrade certificates on domestic flights. As of now, it’s technically impossible for the carriers’ reservations systems to accept upgrade certificates from the other airline’s frequent-flier program.
Mary Clark, a Continental spokeswoman in Houston, confirmed that certificates will be “carrier-specific” for the time being. “We are in the process of aligning the programs, and changes to the current policies will be announced as they are rolled out throughout the year. We aim to fully combine the programs by 2012.”
United is expected to adopt Continental’s reservations system eventually, but until then, there may be another way to resolve the issue. The carriers announced this week that miles can now be transferred between United and Continental accounts. I wonder if they can make it possible for upgrades to be transferred as well. It’s unclear if they looking into such an option yet.
There is another issue with the United system-wide upgrades whose impact is just now becoming apparent. For years, they have been allowed only on tickets booked in W class or higher, which makes S, T, L and K classes ineligible. Continental recently adopted the same rules.
This means that customers often have to spend hundreds of dollars more than the lowest available fare, just to qualify for an upgrade request — and if the upgrade doesn’t clear, they are left with a lot less money and the same coach seat they would have had if they had paid much less for it.
Things are getting even worse. In January, because of the merger, United added a 14th coach booking class, G, which was a regular published booking class on Continental, but on United it was previously an unpublished travel-industry discount class — it didn’t earn miles and was ineligible for upgrades.
Now, instead of four, there are five booking classes ineligible for system-wide upgrades. So what? you might ask — just a small technicality. Not quite. As a result of this change, W fares are getting more expensive. For example, a base fare of $800 that might have booked in W class before, now books in S or T. A few days ago, I helped a friend with a ticket from Washington to Bangkok, and the W base fare was more than $1,400 round trip — including taxes and surcharged, it came up to $1,900.
There is no question that fares have been going up for some time. A few years ago, a W fare to Bangkok was about $900, including taxes. In 2002, an H fare was $900. So the trend is clear and it didn’t start yesterday. But adding one more booking class makes things even worse.
It’s worth pointing out that American Airlines system-wide upgrades are allowed on all published booking classes.
Another negative change as a result of the United-Continental merger is that, similarly to the upgrades, discount vouchers from one airline cannot be used on the other. So if you want to use a United voucher for a ticket to Anchorage, you can’t, because United has given its seasonal service to Continental.
This week, the United website seems to be including Continental flights in electronic certificate-discounted itineraries, but the official policy hasn’t changed. It may be a website glitch, given that it also allows Lufthansa flights, and the vouchers’ terms and conditions specifically say that they are not valid on code-share flights.
One positive merger-related change is that United customers can now avoid StarNet blocking — it has diminished but still exists — by transferring their miles to Continental, which doesn’t block Star Alliance partner award seats.
NOTE: Several months after this column was published, United and Continental made it possible to use upgrades on flights operated by the other airline, including on mixed itineraries.
Related stories:
United, Continental execs at odds over loyalty program
United executive breaks old barriers
Keeping United international first class
Continue reading about United fliers hit by pre-merger changes
Delta Airlines has cemented its status as the network U.S. carrier with the worst frequent-flier program, further devaluing its long-cheapened SkyMiles. The leadership of the program or the airline — or perhaps both — doesn’t seem to understand what the loyalty business in 2011 is about. It may be time for a new team at the top.
For more than a year, Delta failed to publish an award redemption chart for most of the world, resulting in lack of transparency about how many miles were really needed for an award ticket.
When it finally unveiled a chart this week, the mileage rates on many routes were increased significantly. Many loyal SkyMiles members felt cheated and disrespected, calling Delta’s move a “stunt” in comments posted on FlyerTalk, the largest online travel community.
If you wondered why Delta announced last week the elimination of miles’ expiration, my guess is that it tried to soften the blow of what was coming — and to claim that it cares about its customers. In reality, almost everything SkyMiles has done in recent years has been decidedly customer-unfriendly. I’m not an active SkyMiles member and have no dog in this flight, but I’ve been appalled enough to write about it.
In comparison to its two largest competitors, American and United, Delta’s upgrade and award policies are the most restrictive and inflexible. Its system-wide upgrade certificates are only valid on tickets booked in Y, B and M class, and are not transferable. American’s upgrades can be used on just about any fare and gifted to other people. United’s certificates exclude only the lowest booking classes and can also be transferred.
In 2008, Delta devalued its miles by adding a third award tier, in an attempt to mask its very poor award availability at the lowest level. A year later, it devalued its elite status when it introduced a fourth tier, Diamond, on top of Silver, Gold and Platinum. If that’s not bad enough, Delta also charges some fees that are hard to justify, such as $50 for booking an award originating outside the United States.
The main reason frequent-flier programs exist is not to make customers happy, but to make money — and most of them do. I’ve never considered that a problem. A successful business deserves all the rewards it can get. My problem has been with the way airlines have been trying to make money through their so-called loyalty businesses. For decades, they have had an utterly peculiar philosophy, which can be best described at a “screw the customer” approach, which I explain with a misguided view of what the loyalty business is about.
Fortunately, a few airline executives recently saw the light, and things are starting to change. I’ve written several times about what Graham Atkinson did when he was president of United Mileage Plus for less than two years, beginning in the fall of 2008. He understood the essence of customer loyalty and showed that what’s good for the company doesn’t necessarily have to be bad for customers. While he wasn’t able to end StarNet blocking, he actually listened to customers and reversed decisions based on their feedback.
American’s AAdvantage program also has progressive leadership that rewards top fliers appropriately and has tried to make it easier for members to use their miles. There is still a lot to be desired, but it’s on the right track.
Delta, on the other hand, has been stuck in the 20th century. It seems it’s working hard to perfect the “screw the customer” approach.
Related stories:
United executive breaks old barriers
US Airways hears feedback, fixes website
Customers gain sway over airlines
United keeps free stopovers on awards
It’s one of the unavoidable realities of airline customer service that three agents will often give you three different answers to the same question. But I recently discovered a more rare phenomenon: Dozens of agents consistently doing something the wrong way. Was it lack of knowledge or deliberately ignoring the rules?
Before I continue, let me say that there are numerous superb airline agents to whom I’m grateful for unknowingly teaching me the ropes of the complex air travel system for years by satisfying my insatiable curiosity. I’ve also praised U.S. agents for handling rebooking during irregular operations better than their colleagues at foreign airlines.
As with any profession or company, all agents undergo various levels of training and professional development. It’s only human that they don’t remember everything they are taught, as long as they know where to find the answer when they need it. It’s also natural that different agents remember certain parts of the material better than others.
However, the examples of agents convinced they have the right answer when they don’t — and not bothering to check it — are more than I care to count. One of the most common is not knowing the rules of airport business lounge access, and turning away customers who have every right to be there. That happened to me last month in Phoenix, where an agent called a supervisor who agreed with her. Of course, I asked to speak with the supervisor, and when he arrived, all he had to do was read the rules taped on the agent’s desk — then he told me I was right.
Now that I know the system inside out and teach seminars about it — I’ve been told by reservations supervisors that I know much more than most of their agents — I’ve learned how to straighten out an ignorant agent politely and as patiently as time allows. Sometimes, if they are stubborn and I know they are wrong, I resort to one of my cardinal rules: Hang up and call again.
But it turns out there was something even I wasn’t aware of — because no agent I’ve dealt with has ever done it correctly.
In April, I wrote about the numerous airline schedule changes that significantly affect customers’ travel plans and waste them — as well as airline employees — considerable amount of time. One of the issues when a flight is taken off the schedule or you misconnect is what happens to your upgrade.
As regular readers of this column know, I mostly fly on United Airlines, because I’ve had top elite status (1K) for a decade. This year alone, I’ve had dozens of serious schedule changes that have necessitated rebooking and rerouting. If an upgrade has been previously confirmed, the United system automatically rebooks you in the upgraded class — the codes are NF for First Class and NC for Business — even if there is no upgrade space on your new flight.
This is all done by a computer, without human intervention. Very often, however, I don’t like the new routing the system has suggested, so I call reservations to get booked on more sensible flights. For years, agents have said, “We can put you on that flight, but you’d be waitlisted for the upgrade.” Not one, including supervisors, has ever offered to open up an upgrade seat, even when the cabin was completely empty.
Last week, I happened to look at the so-called Rule 260, which governs schedule changes, for a different purpose. I was surprised to read the following under “Protection guidelines” (SD refers to service director, the first supervisory level):
UPGRADED PSGRS AFFECTED BY A SCHEDULE CHANGE SHOULD BE PROTECTED IN THE UPGRADED CLASS IF AVAILABLE.
IF NF/NC IS NOT AVAILABLE — PROTECT CUSTOMER IN F/C IF AVAILABLE AND CONTACT SD FOR CONVERSION.
So as long as the airline is still selling revenue seats in the premium cabin, you are entitled to your upgrade, even if upgrade space is currently not available. In essence, a seat should be opened up for you, provided you had a confirmed upgrade on your original flight that was affected by the schedule change.
When I saw this rule, I called United to clear a waitlist I’d been put on after a schedule change a week earlier. The agent sounded unaware of the rule, but he found it on his computer, booked an F seat and called a service director to convert it to NF, as instructed in Rule 260.
Is it possible that no agent knew about this? Could it be that their training doesn’t cover this particular detail? If it does, are they told not to offer such protection to customers proactively?
When I asked those questions, I was told that agents should know the rule — and that a message was sent to the service director who had waitlisted me the week before to make sure she knows the right procedure.
Related stories:
Flight schedule changes overwhelm agents, travelers
U.S. airlines handle disruptions best
Travel companies teach customer-service lessons
Preserving upgrades in case of rebooking
Continue reading about The peculiarities of airline agent training
