One of this column’s goals is to point out nuisances in the air travel system and help you avoid them or minimize their negative impact. As I welcome the many readers who have become subscribers since my book, “Decoding Air Travel,” came out, I’d like to tell you about one such nuisance.
As my regular readers are well aware by now, I always know in what booking class a future ticket will be issued. I search for availability in that booking class and choose flights with available seats. That’s why, even if I have to make a reservations with an agent on the phone, I know how much the ticket will cost before I make the call.
The only time when this strategy fails is when I need an airline to book a seat on a partner-carrier, and the ticketing airline’s agent can’t “see” availability in the respective booking class in the partner’s inventory. I’m not talking about award seats, so comparisons with United’s StarNet blocking practice would be misplaced — this is about revenue tickets fully paid for with money, not miles.
So why don’t agents see availability in a certain booking class or fare bucket on another carrier? It usually has to do with the Global Distribution System (GDS) they use to book tickets. For example, United currently uses Apollo and Lufthansa Amadeus. Although most of the time the two systems show identical data, there may be occasional delays, and a United agent may not see a Lufthansa seat displayed as available on Amadeus.
I can explain most things in the airline world, but British Airways and Iberia posed a new challenge last month that left me utterly perplexed. The two companies and Oneworld alliance members merged last fall, and they both use Amadeus, which would mean that their agents should see the same data on their screens — at least it would mean so to a logically thinking person. That person, however, would be wrong.
I was booking a trip for a friend, who is also a client, from Washington to Africa in Business Class. He has Gold status with BA and wanted to fly BA to London and connect to Madrid and on to Africa on Iberia.
According to the BA website, his destination doesn’t exist — many airline sites don’t show cities they don’t fly to, but it’s high time BA added the airports served by Iberia now that they are one company. Fine, I thought, what’s the other option? Naturally, the Iberia site, as the Washington-London BA flight could be booked as an Iberia code-share. There was one problem, though: Iberia priced the desired itinerary almost $4,000 higher than BA.
Clearly, the only thing left to do was to call BA — an exercise I don’t look forward to because of the long waiting time. When I finally got an agent at BA’s call center in Jacksonville, Fla., she said there were no available seats in Business Class on Iberia’s flight from Madrid to the African destination, which I’m not revealing on purpose.
I thought she was joking. Amadeus was showing seven open seats in the full-fare Business booking class I needed, which is J class on Iberia. BA doesn’t code-share that particular flight, so it had to be booked a “true” Iberia flight number.
I started scratching my head. How was it possible for BA’s Amadeus-powered computers to show no seats at all when there were seven? Perhaps it had to do with the point of sale (POS) — I’ve seen airlines alter the inventory on the same flight, depending on where you view the data. But both the BA agent in Florida and I were in the U.S. Still, I changed the POS from the U.S. to Europe, but there was no difference. I also called Iberia to verify the seats were indeed available, and Iberia’s agent in Miami saw exactly what I did.
The BA agent tried to explain the discrepancy by telling me that Iberia hadn’t “given” BA any seats, but I immediately asked her to stop making stuff up. There is no such thing as one airline “giving seats” to another — anyone can book a seat if the operating airline has published it in its inventory, even if the second carrier is not a partner of the first.
Despite all the mystery and frustration, that wasn’t the end of the world, I thought. I asked the BA agent to waitlist the segment in question. My plan was to call back in case another agent could find a way to “see” the seat I needed, and if that failed, I would call Iberia and have them clear the waitlist, since their agent had confirmed availability earlier.
I’ve done just that with Star Alliance carriers several times. For example, Singapore Airlines tends to be stingy with D class availability on intercontinental flights. Star uses D class on round-the-world Business Class tickets, and Singapore deems those fixed fares too cheap. If I issue a ticket with another carrier, it might waitlist a Singapore segment. I’d then call Singapore and ask a supervisor to clear the waitlist if he or she found it appropriate. I’ve also done that with Lufthansa, Japan’s All Nippon Airways, South Korea’s Asiana and others.
However, that simple procedure proved too hard for the merged BA and Iberia, both of which use Amadeus, as mentioned earlier. When I called Iberia back, the agent saw available J seats but said that only BA could clear the waitlist. Except that BA couldn’t, because its agents saw no seats. The Iberia agent’s claim sounded odd, because Iberia controls its own inventory, and I thought it had a way to indicate electronically to BA that a waitlisted seat can be confirmed. So I called back but got the same response from another agent.
Then I phoned BA again and asked the agent to call Iberia, hoping the waitlist could be cleared that way. After keeping me on hold for about 20 minutes, the agent hung up without coming back on the line.
I’d had enough of both carriers’ nonsense, so I took matters in my own hands. I called Iberia yet again and asked the agent to book just that one segment in question separately from the original booking. He gave me the new record locator, and I called BA again, explained the situation and asked that agent if she could incorporate the second booking into the initial one and issue the ticket that way.
She couldn’t but a supervisor was able to do it. Part of me was grateful, but the other part was frustrated that the previous BA agents I’d spoken with never offered me the option I eventually thought of, and wasted hours of my time.
What sort of a merger have BA and Iberia created if they can’t perform the most basic airline function — booking available seats on each other’s flights?
Related stories:
British Air loses bags on $12,000 ticket
The peculiarities of airline agent training
American’s antiquated ticketing process
United fliers hit by pre-merger changes
Continue reading about British Air, Iberia’s dysfunctional merger
There must be very few things more embarrassing to an airline than losing the luggage of a passenger who paid more than $12,000 for a First Class ticket. Even more shockingly, British Airways, which did just that last week, didn’t try to right the screamingly obvious wrong and offer some sort of a good-will gesture.
Many of us often wonder who would pay $10,000 or $15,000 for a plane ticket, but let me assure you, there are such people. Premium travel has staged a remarkable recovery in recent months. As I look at flight inventory, I’m amazed every day by how full Business and First Class cabins are on various carriers.
The case in point was actually very close to home, as the passenger was a colleague whom I’d helped book his ticket. Another curious detail was that, after the ticket was issued, he needed to move his return flight a day earlier, and British Airways imposed a $750 penalty for the change — yes, on a $12,000 ticket.
He had one connection — in London, of course — on his way to another European city. Not too complicated, one might think. However, when he arrived at his final destination, his luggage was missing. It was eventually discovered in London, but although British Airways had several more flights to the city where he was that day, the luggage wasn’t delivered at his hotel until 1 a.m. the following day — 12 hours after his arrival.
Not too bad, you might say. Many passengers wait days for their bags, and some never see them again.
I may have agreed with such an attitude had the airline not collected $12,000 from the passenger for this trip. How could any self-respecting carrier not take all necessary measures to ensure that such customers’ luggage arrives on time at the right place? In the grand scheme of things, this wasn’t a huge problem, but it speaks ill of the airline — and it certainly ruins the First Class experience.
What makes things much worse is that, a week after the incident, British Airways, which is a member of the Oneworld alliance, has offered no compensation, good-will gesture or whatever one might call it. Moreover, when the customer asked for a token of appreciation in the Concorde Room, the carrier’s First Class lounge at Heathrow Airport, on his return journey, his request was rejected.
Instead, he was advised to contact Customer Relations. While that may be considered a standard procedure in the airline industry, the airport agent could have been much more helpful and not passed the responsibility to someone else.
After all, the people who pay $12,000 for a plane ticket are not that many. Any airline should try really hard to keep them as customers.
Related stories:
New Lufthansa business class in a year
British leader flies to DC commercially
Avoiding luggage and other airline fees
Airlines cut back on first-class service
Continue reading about British Air loses bags on $12,000 ticket
United Airlines fulfilled its promise this week by finally allowing one-way mileage awards on its partners in the global Star Alliance. More importantly, it showed that its Mileage Plus program is truly an industry leader — it didn’t follow American Airlines in taking away stopovers on award tickets, which will save travelers many frequent-flier miles.
Mileage Plus has become one of the most customer-friendly loyalty programs in the world. As odd as it sounds, offering one-way awards is a rather progressive step, given how rare it is in the industry — for no good reason. United has been offering one-way awards on its own flights since February.
Stopovers on international awards are incredibly useful — they are usually not permitted on domestic tickets. I don’t use them all the time, but I do often enough to mourn their loss on United. They are partly responsible for my visits to 82 countries.
When American banned stopovers last year, its justification was that the introduction of one-way awards eliminated the need for stopovers — one can now visit two cities or countries by booking three one-way segments. The problem for customers was that such an award now costs many more miles.
It would have been easy for United to copy American’s move. After all, taking stopovers away would have taken more miles off its books and decrease its liabilities. United has historically matched various practices initiated by its arch rival, but this time it made its own decision. Mileage Plus members should be grateful — preserving stopovers will save them tens of thousands of miles per trip.
I must admit, I was a bit confused about the stopover policy, and an earlier version of this column said United was doing away with them. I was misled by a reservations agent last weekend, and by a sentence on United’s website, saying “That means no stopovers.” It appears that only applies to one-way awards.
I received a comment from a reader who had seen a thread about the column on FlyerTalk.com, which prompted me to speak with a supervisor at Mileage Plus. He checked his resources and assured me that stopover are still permitted on round trips.
I’ve been praising Mileage Plus repeatedly since Graham Atkinson became president two years ago. In February, I wrote about all the right things Atkinson did — one negative thing he couldn’t change was the infamous StarNet award blocking. At the time, he told me that no decision had been made about stopovers.
Atkinson left United in September, as part of the management changes resulting from the merger with Continental, but I’m glad to see that his approach to customer loyalty lives on.
By the way, don’t forget the 24-hour international connection rule, which lets us do a mini-stop en route, so look for those day-long layovers if you want to sample a new country on the cheap.
Continue reading about United keeps free stopovers on awards
Should the new United Airlines have international first class, like the old United, or not, like the old Continental Airlines? Most frequent fliers expect a decision in favor of one of the two models, but why not go with a mixed model? Why not keep first class on routes where it makes business sense, and fly two-cabin planes where it doesn’t?
Since the two carriers’ merger was announced in May, there have been many opinions in online travel forums advocating just coach and business class, but it’s hard to see the world’s largest airline without long-haul first class at all. Continental may call its premium cabin BusinessFirst, but it’s business class.
In addition, United has already installed new first- and business class seats on more than half of its wide-body fleet, and it makes little sense to now remove first class and expand business class.
Regardless of the mechanics, there are routes that can sustain first class and actually make money, especially now that business travel has recovered from the slump during the global recession. Wouldn’t it be a luxury for United to pick and choose the routes on which it operates three-cabin planes and even change them seasonally?
Many foreign airlines have flown both two- and three-cabin aircraft on long-haul international routes for years, including United partners in the global Star Alliance, such as Lufthansa, Thai Airways and Asiana Airlines. In fact, Asiana currently flies one two-cabin and one three-cabin plane daily between Seoul and Los Angeles. In the Oneworld alliance, British Airways, Cathay Pacific and Qantas use a mixed model.
If you look at the loads in both first and business class on all those carriers, you will discover that they are selling extremely well — many flights in the next few weeks are actually sold out. As I reported last year, the recession forced some airlines to cut back on first-class service temporarily, but things now are very different.
So let’s not count United’s first class out quite yet.
Related stories:
Why new United should have domestic business — not first — class
New Lufthansa business class in a year
United, Continental execs at odds over loyalty program
Flying new United route — rare occurrence
What to do with empty premium seats?
Airlines cut back on first-class service
Continue reading about Keeping United international first class
Three major travel-industry organizations begin a campaign on Tuesday to compel the airlines to disclose all fees not included in the ticket price at the same time as the actual fare — and before the ticket is issued. But will such a campaign succeed?
The groups — the Business Travel Coalition (BTC), the American Society of Travel Agents and the Consumer Travel Alliance — want consumers to sign a petition to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. The text urges him “to require airlines to fully disclose their fees, whether airfares are purchased on an airline’s website or through an online or brick-and-mortar travel agency.”
The organizations plan to deliver the petition to LaHood on Sept. 23, which they have designated as “Mad As Hell Day.” They have created a special website and a YouTube channel.
“It is imperative that we, as consumers, have the ability to comparison-shop and know the full cost of a trip before committing to a purchase,” BTC Chairman Kevin Mitchell said in an e-mail message on Monday. The “airline hidden fees can surprise us at the airport, ruining our holidays, or vanquishing our business travel budgets. For example, check baggage fees can add 30%, 40% or more to the price of a ticket.”
The campaign is in support of the Department of Transportation’s Notice of Proposed Rule Making, regarding airline-passenger protections, Mitchell said.
What’s the likelihood that this initiative will be more successful than previous attempts to extract similar disclosures from the airlines? How long has the battle over false airfare advertising been going on? To this day, you see examples like this one on most U.S. airline websites: $199 each way, based on a required round-trip purchase, plus taxes and surcharges.
If a round trip is mandatory, why on earth are they quoting half of the price? It’s actually less than half, given the extra taxes. As I’ve written before, such deception is not tolerated in Europe and most other parts of the world.
If you can’t get the airlines to be open and honest about their fares, how are you supposed to force them to disclose additional fees? While everyone has to pay for the fare, many passengers are exempt from luggage, standby and other fees — an argument the airlines will no doubt use against the new campaign.
Getting those fees waived is easier than most travelers think. As I wrote in July, all you need is the lowest level of elite status on any member of one of the three global airline alliances — Oneworld, SkyTeam or the Star Alliance — to have your bags fly for free alliance-wide. And sometimes, it takes as little as 3,000 miles to achieve that.
As often happens, my advice has to do with travel education. Air travel has become a maze of rules, fees and restrictions that’s hard to keep up with. So travelers need to invest time to learn the system and find ways to work around it. My experience so far with “On the Fly” Seminars shows that most people don’t think they need to get educated. How many more fees and other frustrations will it take to change their mind?
Related stories:
Avoiding luggage and other airline fees
When an airfare sale is not quite a sale
Fare sales often lost in translation
Continue reading about 9/23 is ‘mad as hell day’ over airline fees
